Infinite Imagining – Gerald Murnane’s The Plains

Gerald Murnane’s The Plains is perhaps nothing more than a collection of possibilities. A filmmaker goes to the central plains of Australia to make a film for the inhabitants on the country’s populated coastal edges. He is hired by one of the great families of the plains and he stays in the man’s house for twenty years. As for the film, it is never produced. This is all the plot there is to it. But we read through the novel as we walk through a field in the summer, stopping constantly to wonder at everything that eludes our gaze from afar. We learn of the religions of the plainsmen, of their obsessions with emblems and symbols, of their love affairs, and their wars.

The plains have little in common with the real plains of Australia. Instead, this is a highly philosophical book. But not in the sense that it puts forward arguments about the nature of things intending to convince us of some view or other. Instead, it offers us suggestions for interpreting the world that together form not a worldview but rather reflect the fruits of a certain vision of things. The novel shows us not how to live but what a certain life can look like. It is a life of the imagination, of the infinite possibilities of meaning-making latent within us. And reading the novel, we find that this emphasis on the imagination and its limitless potential has a far more practical, human value than we might otherwise guess.

What Does a Plain Mean?

“Twenty years ago, when I first arrived on the plains, I kept my eyes open. I looked for anything in the landscape that seemed to hint at some elaborate meaning behind appearances.”

What is a plain? What does the thought of it do to us? A patch of flatland, with the occasional tree or stream. It is not a complex image. On a piece of paper, we could represent a plain with a single horizontal line. And yet the more we consider a plain, the more Murnane’s novel makes us consider it, we realise just what possibilities are contained within that line, behind it, above it, beyond it. The central event of the novel’s first part is a meeting with the great landowners of the plains at the saloon of the town where the filmmaker is staying. A great many people have gathered at the place to offer their services to those rich men who with a single gesture could offer them work for the rest of their lives.

One man offers a way of representing the great families’ histories on graphs, and for hours they sit with coloured pencils drawing. Others come to offer religions, or emblems, to the landowners. They are constantly reinventing themselves, and always in need of the new visions that such outsiders can provide. Another man talks of a musical concert where the instruments are so far away from each other that we can only hear one or two at the same time, forcing us to imagine the harmonies that would be possible to hear if we were located in some invisible other point.

Many of the ideas and thoughts of The Plains suggest a space that must be filled by the imagination, like the concert/ stage. The philosophies that the plainsmen prefer never answer everything, always leaving space for interpretation. The plainsmen prefer to keep to their own understanding of the plains, rather than suggest that they are limited by common ground. We learn of relationships where after a single meeting two lovers promise never to meet again because the strength of the promise of that meeting is so great that no future reality could ever compare to it- better to fantasise than to live in disappointment. These are people whose imagination can replace a life of experiences but not in a way that seems sad to us. The sheer richness of the thoughts that Murnane describes makes it seem that we are the ones who are missing out on a full life.

Plains of the Soul

Reflection, the journey into another plain – the plain of the self – is the natural mode of these plainsmen. “The plainsman’s heroes, in life and in art, were such as the man who went home every afternoon for thirty years to an unexceptional house with neat lawns and listless shrubs and sat late into the night deciding on the route of a journey that he might have followed for thirty years only to arrive at the place where he sat”. There is a poem of the plains whose thousands of lines only describe the space around a woman seen from afar, but in so doing plant such seeds for the imagination that no description of her could ever compare.

We learn of the infinite plains of the soul. That “each man in his heart is a traveller in a boundless landscape. But even the plainsmen (who should have learned not to fear hugeness of horizons) looked for landmarks and signposts in the disquieting terrain of the spirit” – this is the view of one philosopher of the plains. The mansion where the narrator spends his years is filled with notes and diaries of the place’s previous occupants, and we soon realise that it takes far more than a lifetime to cross the plains of another’s world. The man barely talks to his patron’s wife or daughter, but he creates a plain for them in his mind.

We learn of a war between two factions. The Horizonites and the Haremen grew out of squabbling groups of artists. The former saw the infinite distances bespoken by the far distance as the greatest source of inspiration, while the latter saw the infinite variety of what lies before us as something still richer. Their disagreement bubbled for many years before suddenly disappearing without the armed conflict that seemed inevitable. As with the rest of the action of The Plains, it seemed that the imagination was the best space for carrying out the war.

Meaning-Making

“The mind is its own place, and in itself / Can make a heaven of hell, a hell of heaven.” Milton wrote in Paradise Lost. Murnane’s novel shows the imagination making a heaven out of a space that we might imagine leading only to boredom. The Plains is not a novel that aims to answer our questions. Murnane’s narrator even notes that plains are “simply a convenient source of metaphors for those who know that men invent their own meanings”. Yet if we are to create our own meanings, we must know how to. We must train ourselves to look upon the world in a way that sees the potential for meaning-making lying in everyday things.

I love The Plains because I find this thought dizzyingly exciting. We know of those poets like Rilke who can entertain themselves with contemplating a single object, but Murnane seems to go further – he does not find beauty alone in single-minded contemplation, but a realm of infinite meanings and possibilities.

The Hidden Humanism of The Plains

Our capacity to imagine is perhaps the most extraordinary of human faculties. To see its sharpened form and feel our own be sharpened, as we do in Murnane’s novel, ultimately has a decidedly humanistic effect that seems surprising when we consider that The Plains has very little to do with those aspects of novels that normally make them seem human to us – plots and people. The American philosopher, Thomas Nagel, whom I’ve also been reading recently, notes in his essay “Death” that what makes death bad are “hopes which may or may not be fulfilled or possibilities which may or may not be realized”. In dying we lose possibilities, and the earlier and more unexpectedly we die the greater that loss is.

Death has little to do with Murnane’s novel, but it too is a plain that all of us must cross. More importantly, though, Murnane’s novel provides another way of looking at what Nagel talks about when he refersto lost possibilities. Now, this may seem silly. After all, we know what possibilities a young man at war may lose when a bomb explodes nearby – a sweetheart left unmarried, an unfounded family, an empty seat at the table where his friends sit and break bread. What good is a novel about imagination next to these realities, we might ask?

Only this – that Murnane’s novel reveals a layer of possibilities and riches lying even beyond that which comes to mind most obviously as having the potential to be lost. The novel is like the explorer it at one point describes whose task “is to postulate the existence of a land beyond the known land.” This land is the land of the imagination, and we come to feel by the end of The Plains just how infinite it is. If we die, we do not only lose the infinite world without us, but also the infinite world within us. Newly aware of the depth, death becomes more terrible, and life becomes still more wondrous, vital, and worth holding on to with all the strength we have.

Anyway, it is the kind of book that opens up a world. Just for that reason, it is well worth reading. 


I previously looked at Murnane’s Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs, which I was less impressed by, here. The Plains, which I have now read twice, is a much better book.

Imagination’s Paradise? – Gerald Murnane’s Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs

I read the Australian author Gerald Murnane’s novel The Plains last year, after coming across him in a long feature from the New York Times. The article paints him as an eccentric connoisseur of the imagination; a man who, though he has never left his small home region in Australia, nevertheless creates vast worlds within us, stretching our imagination in ways we hadn’t thought possible. I loved The Plains, though I wasn’t quite sure how to write about it. Although on a basic level it is the story of a man, come to the central plains of Australia to make a film about the place, the novel was really about the way that the simple idea of “the plains”, a central, apparently empty space, can actually contain a complex network of hidden meanings. How it’s much more than meets the eye.

Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs is a collection of essays by Murnane, but even to call them that has its problems. Murnane’s fiction and non-fiction form a continuum, much as do the works of Borges, who Murnane cites as one of his inspirations. But where Borges makes his fictions essay-like and academic, Murnane makes his non-fiction oddly fictional. There is little concrete information here, and what we do read that might be factual never feels very reliable. Instead, what we get out of each of the essays collected in Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs is an invitation into a kind of fugue state in which images melt into other images and our imagination is made child-like and free again.

The Cover of Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs shows a man riding a horse against a background showing a map of Hungary
The cover of Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs shows two of Murnane’s main obsessions – Horse Racing and Hungary. Both of them are discussed within the essays

Murnane has a poet’s sense for the magical potential of everyday objects to open up a world of associations, and the highest praise I can give the collection is to say that having finished it you go out into the world with fresh eyes, with the world itself equally fresh and made newly beautiful. But Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs isn’t without its problems, and a recommendation comes with certain caveats. For the book’s strengths, and its weaknesses, read on.

Spaces and Imagination

The essays in Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs are chronologically ordered, and certain themes and ideas repeat throughout, although in each instance with a slightly different shade. One of the first major themes of the book is that of space, of empty space, and its potential. Murnane recounts inOn the Road to Bendigo: Kerouac’s Australian Life how, as a child, he used to watch American films. He didn’t get much out of them – the action went too fast for him. Instead, he focused on the things which seemed unchangeable, stable. “The places where nothing seemed to happen.” The great brown vistas that lie behind the horse rider in a Western, for example. And over time Murnane began to fill the scenery, if not with action, then at least with his own ideas. He realised that “the way to understand a place” is “to turn your back on it”. To imagine.

And so Murnane reads Kerouac, and he reads Kerouac’s biographies, but he never boards a plane. Instead, in his head, he creates his own America, pieced together from Kerouac’s writings and those who write about him. If there is something that ties together the various essays of Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs, it is this idea of the way that everything can be a tool for the creation of an inner, imaginary world within us. This has its dangers. Murnane’s infatuation with the imagination comes across almost solipsistic at times. He himself, in The Breathing Author, says that he acknowledges other people’s inner existences, but that he can only see other minds and their contents within the space of his own imagination, as a “landscape” his own mind’s “landscape”. While this may be true to how we understand each other, the way he emphasises it rather devalues individual human dignity…

“Stream System” and Associations of Images

Murnane is a mathematical writer. He likes his fictions to conform to shapes, like circles or triangles or whatever. Perhaps his most famous short story, which is also included among the essays here (another example of genre bending), is called “Stream System”. The narrator of the essay/story goes to a place which is marked on the map as “stream system”. This then sets off a chain of memories, thoughts, and associations, which eventually leads him to face repressed memories about his failure to be kind to his own brother, who died young and unloved. It is well done. We circle around the idea of this location on the map, but with each loop (as it were) the meaning of the water system changes, and new images are heaped on top of the old.

And meaning, the metonymic shifting of meaning, is key to Murnane’s whole project. As he writes, “my writing was not an attempt to produce something called “literature” but an attempt to discover meaning”. “Meaning” he later defines as what exists when he can see in his mind a thing “being connected to some other thing or things.” His whole fictional world concerns the creation of connections and meanings. In this, he stands awkwardly alongside postmodern writers like Don Delillo and Thomas Pynchon. Where they see conspiratorial connections in everything, Murnane seeks to connect apparently unrelated things together, finding in this act of connecting the very purpose of his work. It is, perhaps, an altogether more positive idea. Even though it is one that is very much divorced from the world itself.

Writing and its purpose

Murnane wanted to be a poet when he was young. And his writing, even in these essays, has a poetical quality to it. Not in the sense of a rhyme that creeps into the text. Rather, there is a hypnotic quality to Murnane’s rhythm and repetitions that borders the same world of free and childlike imagination that the best poetry does. It is, in a way, incantatory at times. And in Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs there are a lot of details for one who wants to understand how he works. Not only is there the business of the stream system that I’ve mentioned above, but Murnane also quotes approvingly, on the subject of rhythm, the likes of Robert Louis Stevenson – “Each sentence, by successive phrases, shall first come into a kind of knot, and then, after a moment of suspended meaning, solve and clear itself”.

For Murnane, writing is a way of creating meaning between images. But it also has the exorcism-like purpose that it does for other writers – he writes to remove things from himself. “My sentences arise out of images and feelings that haunt me – not always painfully; sometimes quite pleasantly. These images and feelings haunt me until I find the sentences to bring them into this world”. In the same way as Murnane turns other people into imaginations contained within his own imagination, his view of the purpose of literature is similarly unambitious. For him, it never explains anything, rather it simply serves to show “how stupendously complicated everything is”. He isn’t interested in creating living, breathing characters, so much as reflecting a real mind. What that means in practice is that his stories simply aim to make us believe that only his narrators are real. Believing the rest is unimportant.

Hungary, Horse Riding, Idiosyncrasies

Murnane is weird. He loves horse races, imagining decades of races and writing down their details over the course of his life. For him the best literature aspires to the condition of horse racing, and when he reads a good book he imagines it as a rider, approaching the finish on the field. He has never worn sunglasses, has never learned to swim. He has never gone voluntarily into an art gallery. He comes across, on multiple occasions in Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs, as a kind of aesthetic hermit. His influences – Borges, Calvino, Proust, and others – are all idiosyncratic, but with them I have never felt such a conscious retreat from the real world into the imagined one. Murnane often doesn’t seem interested in… well… anything.

Even books seem not to interest him in a serious way – he reads the same old ones over and over. And ultimately, the impression I had at times while I read Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs was not a positive one. We are taken from the world so brutally, so completely, that it’s hard not to miss it. His style itself becomes grating.

One of the biggest disappoints of the book for me was the final essay, “The Angel’s Son: Why I learned Hungarian Late in Life”. It is an exciting premise, but instead of answering it Murnane goes on another walk among past images, reaching the actual subject – Hungarian – very late in the essay. Of course, there are some beautiful turns of phrase – “if an English word or phrase is a pane of clear glass with something called a meaning on its far side, a Hungarian word is a pane of coloured glass. The meaning on the other side of that glass is apparent to me, but I can never be unaware of the rich tints of the glass.” – but that’s what Murnane’s good at. It’s not a surprise.

Even though the essay is in keeping with Murnane’s general style within Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs, I couldn’t help but feel disappointed at the end. When I actually wanted to know something, the whole essay revealed itself to be akin to a construct of smoke and mirrors, and wholly unsatisfactory.

Conclusion

If you want to read Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs my recommendation comes with these warnings. There is almost nothing here, even though the nothingness is beautiful. Murnane’s style is unique, and the experience of being led into a world of the imagination is not without its charms. It’s also certainly true that his appreciation – ironically enough – of the objects of our world as sources of images is capable of leading us into the world, rather than away from it. But Murnane, it is fair to say, is one of those writers who is best sampled a few pages at a time. Reading Invisible Yet Enduring Lilacs through within the space of a week, I felt especially keenly the problems of the work. Perhaps it has made me be unfair. Murnane is a unique writer, and certainly worth one’s time, but The Plains is a much more exciting book, and that’s the one I’d start with. If you’ve come across Murnane yourself and have a different view, why not leave a comment? He’s not the most accessible writer, and it may be that I just don’t know how to approach him.